EnigmA Amiga Run 1995 November/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 02 (1995)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1995-11][Skylink CD].iso/earcd/docs/lwml9506.lha/LIGHTWAVE-JUNE95/[e-mail]_Fri Jun 16 23:28:33 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-07-04 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179720513; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 23:28:33 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from heather.wis.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179610507; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 23:28:27 -0700
Received: from njland.UUCP (uunjland@localhost) by heather.wis.com (8.6.9/heather) with UUCP id BAA05743 for [e-mail]; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:08:54 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE-PAR or NOT PAR (Thomas Healy
From: [e-mail] (ROBERT COHEN)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 17:53:00 -0500
Organization: New JerseyLand 426 Slocum Ave Neptune, NJ 07753 908-918-8682
Reply-To: [e-mail] (ROBERT COHEN)
X-Mailreader: PCBoard Version 15.21
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.10
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Hi Thomas,

I had my Video Toaster/Lightwave combo for three and one half years
before being fortunate enough to afford the PAR.  If you have the
fastest rendering machine you can afford, but no practical / affordable
means of getting your work to video...Then what's the point?  I find
that situation most frustrating, personally.  So.... I would strongly
suggest that if you can swing the bucks, go for the PAR.  I don't think
you will regret it.  As far the as the quality of the PC PAR over the
Amiga (I own Amiga), I have read multiple posts suggesting that the PC
is just as good (if not better) than the Amiga version.

Good luck...

[e-mail]
--
[e-mail] (ROBERT COHEN) sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]